<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital tv antenna</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electroschematics.com/2643/digital-tv-antenna/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electroschematics.com/2643/digital-tv-antenna/</link>
	<description>visit electroschematics.com every day for great electronics articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:08:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Johann</title>
		<link>http://electroschematics.com/2643/digital-tv-antenna/comment-page-1/#comment-6776</link>
		<dc:creator>Johann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electroschematics.com/?p=2643#comment-6776</guid>
		<description>My Philco D-A Converter Box TB100HH9 keeps crashing, every few minutes.  It may load and/or play channels, to just crash at any point.  I say &quot;crash&quot; as then you have to turn it off and on again.

Is it junk?  I thought maybe because I was using rabbit ears as antenna, but I&#039;m in Houston where there should be 15+ channels down the street.  Analog was GREAT here, now we&#039;re screwed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Philco D-A Converter Box TB100HH9 keeps crashing, every few minutes.  It may load and/or play channels, to just crash at any point.  I say &#8220;crash&#8221; as then you have to turn it off and on again.</p>
<p>Is it junk?  I thought maybe because I was using rabbit ears as antenna, but I&#8217;m in Houston where there should be 15+ channels down the street.  Analog was GREAT here, now we&#8217;re screwed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://electroschematics.com/2643/digital-tv-antenna/comment-page-1/#comment-6308</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electroschematics.com/?p=2643#comment-6308</guid>
		<description>twin-lead or open wire is great for putting in your rubbish bin. I replace the old cable almost 6 days a week. It was good for vhf and was great in it&#039;s day but there is a number of reasons why it is not used anymore. If it was better then RG6 then Foxtel would be using it!

I&#039;m in a fringe signal area with all channels on UHF and my Digital TV is Perfect :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>twin-lead or open wire is great for putting in your rubbish bin. I replace the old cable almost 6 days a week. It was good for vhf and was great in it&#8217;s day but there is a number of reasons why it is not used anymore. If it was better then RG6 then Foxtel would be using it!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in a fringe signal area with all channels on UHF and my Digital TV is Perfect :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles</title>
		<link>http://electroschematics.com/2643/digital-tv-antenna/comment-page-1/#comment-5154</link>
		<dc:creator>charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electroschematics.com/?p=2643#comment-5154</guid>
		<description>hey guys..how about mobile video?..after changing to digital in my car....i think i get less signal from digital..i think i got a better longer lasting pic from analog when driving ..than with digital..any sugesstions?..thanx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey guys..how about mobile video?..after changing to digital in my car&#8230;.i think i get less signal from digital..i think i got a better longer lasting pic from analog when driving ..than with digital..any sugesstions?..thanx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://electroschematics.com/2643/digital-tv-antenna/comment-page-1/#comment-4929</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electroschematics.com/?p=2643#comment-4929</guid>
		<description>refer below</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>refer below</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://electroschematics.com/2643/digital-tv-antenna/comment-page-1/#comment-4928</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electroschematics.com/?p=2643#comment-4928</guid>
		<description>You would think that coax is better, hence the surprise mentioned from Dave.

From the antenna engineering handbook.  With 100 ft of wire a twin lead will loose only 3.3 db&#039;s compared to coax at 7.1 db&#039;s.

@ radiofanatic - you may need to rethink your strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would think that coax is better, hence the surprise mentioned from Dave.</p>
<p>From the antenna engineering handbook.  With 100 ft of wire a twin lead will loose only 3.3 db&#8217;s compared to coax at 7.1 db&#8217;s.</p>
<p>@ radiofanatic &#8211; you may need to rethink your strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
